Shifting Alliances: The Impact of July 2025 Political Events on Global Power Dynamics and the Future of BRICS and NATO
Abdinasir Hassan Muhumed (Timoweyne)
In July 2025, significant political events reshaped the dynamics of global power, particularly influencing strategic partnerships among major nations. The emerging landscape reflects a response to the rise of alternative power blocs such as BRICS and shifts within established alliances like NATO. As countries navigate these changes, understanding their implications becomes increasingly crucial.
One of the most remarkable developments arises from BRICS, an alliance originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. As BRICS's geopolitical impact expands, its role in the global order becomes more pronounced. Khanduri (2025) explains that BRICS emphasizes collaboration among its members while also challenging U.S. dominance in international affairs. This transformation reflects a broader trend toward a multipolar world. Urio (2024) outlines China’s strategic efforts to assert its place in this emerging order. The events of July 2025 seem to mark the culmination of such efforts, as BRICS continues to redefine power relations across the globe (Heine, 2025).
The evolving nature of BRICS is further highlighted by internal differences among its members. Punetha (2024) observes that while BRICS shares a common goal of counterbalancing Western influence, differing national priorities sometimes cause friction within the group. For example, the Russia–China relationship represents a complex alliance that affects global dynamics. Bin (2024) discusses the precarious position these nations occupy under increasing Western pressure. As such, BRICS’s capacity to maintain unity while promoting its members’ diverse interests will be central to its long-term impact.
On the other hand, NATO’s role in the global power hierarchy is under scrutiny as it adapts to a changing geopolitical environment. As Alexiou (2024) notes, NATO must balance external challenges posed by Russia and China with internal cohesion. Lynch III (2024) argues that NATO’s future relevance depends on its ability to respond to new threats in an increasingly multipolar world. The political events of July 2025 have highlighted these issues, revealing that NATO can no longer rely solely on a U.S.-led framework.
The evolving dynamics of BRICS and NATO illustrate a contrast between emerging and traditional global alliances. Cronin (2024) argues that the rise of BRICS+ signals a renewed struggle for influence in a world increasingly defined by regional power centers. This shift suggests diminishing Western control over international affairs. Merino and Jiang (2025) further emphasize that BRICS+ challenges long-established power structures, reflecting the broader transition to a multipolar order.
Beyond BRICS and NATO, other alliances are also being tested. Stoletov (2024) contends that China's strategic partnership with Russia could lead to stronger anti-Western coalitions. The events of July 2025 serve as a reminder that global alliances are fluid and may rapidly adapt to shifting interests. Countries like Indonesia are exploring their positions, balancing domestic priorities with a desire for global stability (Syamsudin, 2025).
Global transformation involves not only strategic positioning but also socioeconomic factors that shape these partnerships. For instance, emerging powers are increasingly rejecting perceived Western imperialism. Bond (2024) analyzes how sub-imperial partnerships reinforce this trend. The implications for global trade, security, and cultural exchange are evolving as BRICS expands its influence.
In conclusion, the international political events of July 2025 mark a critical moment in the reconfiguration of global power. As NATO reassesses its role amid renewed competition, BRICS appears poised to grow in influence. The ability of both entities to forge effective and inclusive partnerships will significantly shape future international relations. As Amoah (2025) argues, historical legacies of decolonization and realignment continue to inform today’s shifting alliances, highlighting a world in constant transformation.
__________________
Citations:
Khanduri, Akshat. Analysis of the Geopolitical Impact of BRICS On the Global Order with a special emphasis on India. (2025). https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/197193/130412940.pdf?sequence=1
Urio, Paolo. The Acceleration of the Making of the New Multi-polar World: China’s Strategy at Its Best. In China: From Poverty to World Power, pp. 375-452. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-6922-3_8
Punetha, Anurag. Geopolitical Alignment and Internal Differences in the BRICS Bloc. India Foundation. https://indiafoundation.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/January-February-2025-IF-Journal.pdf#page=13
Bin, Yu. Moscow and Beijing at the Dawn of A Grave New World of Trump 2.0. Comparative Connections: A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations 26, no. 2 (2024). https://cc.pacforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/13-China-Russia-.pdf
Alexiou, Evripidis. The future of the bilateral relations between Russia and the USA, in the context of China's rise and the new Cold War. Master's thesis, Πανεπιστήμιο Πειραιώς, 2024. https://dione.lib.unipi.gr/xmlui/handle/unipi/16547
Cronin, Jeremy. Brics+ in the Context of a Struggle for a New Global Order. Theory & Struggle 125, no. 1 (2024): 56-60. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/abs/10.3828/theory.2024.5
Merino, Gabriel E., and Jiang Tianjiao. BRICS+ and the Global Power Transition. Chinese Political Science Review (2025): 1-33. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41111-025-00291-5
Bond, Patrick. Rising dangers of imperial+ sub-imperial partnering:–CADTM. (2024). https://www.cadtm.org/Rising-dangers-of-imperial-sub-imperial-partnering
Ziguo, Li. Evolution and Prospects of Russia's Turn to the East. China International Studies 107 (2024). https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=16733258&asa=N&AN=180850357&h=hJGGFDvlO6L84yZhGCR7EFk99v6ydl4duXnUlPMADzvtoISf9fzpKQxACTaycFHYZWlPTzY5z3qLNhtGC7zS7Q%3D%3D&crl=c
Stoletov, Oleg V. China’s Geoeconomic Strategy in the Context of the “Awakening” of the Global South. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 24, no. 3 (2024): 329-344. https://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/view/41021
Heine, Jorge. Brazil, the BRICS and Active Non-Alignment. CEBRI-Revista: Brazilian Journal of International Affairs 13 (2025): 40-57. https://cebri-revista.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/253
Schepers, Névine, Mark N. Katz, Sören Urbansky, Martin Wagner, and Aleksei Zakharov. Russia’s International Allies and Partners. Russian Analytical Digest (RAD) 325 (2025). https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/730664
Full-Scale, A. Decade Post. Russia 2032 Scenarios. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Elena-Davlikanova/publication/391739039_Russia_2032_Scenarios_A_Decade_Post_Full-Scale_Invasion_of_Ukraine_PERSPECTIVES_FROM_A_NEIGHBOR_WHO_KNOWS_TOO_WELL/links/6824f5badf0e3f544f5474f7/Russia-2032-Scenarios-A-Decade-Post-Full-Scale-Invasion-of-Ukraine-PERSPECTIVES-FROM-A-NEIGHBOR-WHO-KNOWS-TOO-WELL.pdf
FELIX, AMIEYEOFORI VALENTINE. CHINESE AMBITIOUS STRIVE TO LEAD A NEW WORLD ORDER AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE AFRICAN CONTINENT. https://www.academia.edu/download/117783341/ijssmr.2024.pdf
Puranen, Matti. ‘Global Transformation’: Chinese Scholars Debate the International System in the Aftermath of the War in Ukraine (2022–2024). Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 19, no. 2 (2025): 99-119. https://cejiss.org/images/_2025/CEJISS_19-2.pdf#page=100
Burrows, Mathew, Collin Meisel, and Nvard Chalikyan. Russia Futures. (2025). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep71158.pdf?acceptTC=true&coverpage=false&addFooter=false
Syamsudin, Achmad. Indonesia's Diplomacy Strategy in BRICS: Bridging National Interest and Global Political Balance. Security Intelligence Terrorism Journal (SITJ) 2, no. 2 (2025): 28-36. https://sitjournal.com/sitj/article/view/44
Puri, Samir, Christine Cheng, Jade McGlynn, Joe Devanny, Grant Christopher, Rebecca Lucas, and David Roberts. Strategic Commentaries. (2024). https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PEA3600/PEA3655-1/RAND_PEA3655-1.pdf
Lynch III, Thomas F. The Future of Great Power Competition: Trajectories, Transitions, and Prospects for Catastrophic War. Joint Force Quarterly 114, no. 2 (2024): 8-23. https://digitalcommons.ndu.edu/joint-force-quarterly/vol114/iss2/4/
Amoah, Michael. Decolonizing Superpower Relations: Partnerships with China and Russia. In Decolonizing African Politics: Bridging the Contours of Debate, pp. 107-115. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-89218-9_7
